Shakespeare Timeline Infographic
The above Shakespeare timeline infographic lists the historically documented and dated facts known about Shakespeare. You might also want to check out our Shakespeare timeline page which goes... more »
“Tomorrow, And Tomorrow, And Tomorrow” Macbeth Soliloquy Analysis
Read Macbeth’s Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow soliloquy below with modern English translation & analysis
Spoken by Macbeth, Macbeth Act 5 Scene 5
Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day
To the last syllable of recorded time,
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
“Tomorrow, And Tomorrow, And Tomorrow” Soliloquy Translation:
How the days stretched out – each one the same as the one before, and they would continue to do so, tediously, until the end of history. And every day we have lived has been the last day of some other fool’s life, each day a dot of candle-light showing him the way to his death-bed. Blow the short candle out: life was no more than a walking shadow – a poor actor – who goes through all the emotions in one hour on the stage and then bows out. It was a story told by an idiot, full of noise and passion, but meaningless.
See other Macbeth soliloquies >>
Read Macbeth in modern English >>
-
10 Shakespearean New Years Resolutions
I was surfing around looking for some inspiration to write a blog post on Shakespeare & New Year when I came across a wonderful piece on Peter Pappas’ tax... more »
-
London 2012: All About Shakespeare!
As 2012 comes to an end, with the world mired in an economic morass, one thing we can reflect on with pleasure is the 2012 English summer with its... more »
-
Shakespeare & Venice
It’s almost certain that Shakespeare never left the shores of England but every year thousands of his contemporaries, wealthy young men, embarked on the ‘grand tour’ of European cities:... more »
-
Shakespeare in Tofflerland – To App Or Not To App
Shakespeare lived and wrote his plays in the era that the American futurologist, Alvin Toffler, dubbed ‘the first wave.’ That was the agrarian period between the hunter-gatherer era and... more »
-
Justin and Selena – A Modern Day Romeo and Juliet
Shakespeare enthusiasts who follow the doings of celebrities – their courtships, marriages, divorces, births and deaths – might be struck by the Justin Bieber and Selina Gomez pictures and stories... more »
-
Shakespeare’s Kings – The Plays vs Reality
The English kings of Shakespeare’s history plays are so convincingly portrayed that they have become historical reality for most people. For example, we follow Shakespeare’s King Henry V from... more »
-
Spooky Shakespeare: The Shakespeare Halloween Edition!
Shakespeare really was a man for all occasions, and Halloween is no exception. From witches, potions and haunted castles to severed hands, tongues cut from mouths and loved ones... more »
-
Reasons We Know Shakespeare Wrote His Plays
The distinguished Shakespearean actor, Dame Janet Suzman has just published a book entitled Not Hamlet, about the treatment of women in theatre. One of the chapters addresses the Shakespeare conspiracy... more »
-
Shakespeare’s Ancestry
The only reason we know anything at all about William Shakespeare and his ancestry is because scholars are very interested in him and have made the effort to find... more »
22 Responses to “Tomorrow, And Tomorrow, And Tomorrow” Macbeth Soliloquy Analysis
By “modern English,” what does this writer mean?
I can’t see what is either modern in the interpretation, or what is not modern in the original. Perhaps it is not modern to be more succinct, more clear of meaning, and more beautifully spoken.
The paraphrase – not translation – suggests that “modern” might mean “confused, redundant, without understanding or clarity of thought,”
This surely illustrates why the original continues to be passed through the generations, and the vulgar “translation” signifies nothing.
Couldn’t agree more. The passage is complete and needs nothing. It couldn’t be better said nor does it need any explanation.
I agree totally. These are words spoken by a man who has just seen his whole world come to an end. His schemes have gone wrong, his wife is dead, and she was the foundation of his soul. What he says is very much what a man in his circumstances would say.
jesus H. Christ…..doesn’t this just sum up the dumbing down and shallowness of american culture? this butchery of macbeth would be laughable if it weren’t so sad because there is some puffed-up, self-important ass out there who thinks he’s actually accomplished something with this “translation.” truly, what an idiot.
The English language has lost much clarity and precision in four hundred years. Even the original text here is subject to a dramatic turn of meaning when one fine point is unclear. until reading this paraphrase, I assumed “syllable of recorded time” referred to the instant that MacBeth’s thought, with the utterance of the final syllable” time”, moved from future to past without consequence. I may be over complicating the intent, but the greater context just feels richer to me in this light. That may well be my own personal experience shading what I read, but that’s what great writing is supposed to encourage!
How does this:
“a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage”
becomes this:
“a poor actor – who goes through all the emotions in one hour on the stage”
“struts and frets” wouldn’t imply something like going hesitantly, ungraciously?
what i understand from it is that the actor is wasting his/her time and everyone else’s which results to nothing.
Maybe I am over simplifying, I only have a BA in English literature, but I think he is personifying the concept of time,by saying it’s a player,and that player worries and rushes and works his way to get his story told, but in the end it is not of any substance. Time has no value, but the value we place on it.
That is what Shakespeare is referring to. When he says a poor player on stage, he means an actor. Its a metaphor referring to how an actor goes on stage, and to him that moment is the most important of his life, but to the rest of the audience he is just another actor- another player. He practices and prepares so much for this moment where he “struts and frets” on stage for only an hour or so, and when its finally over, even though it might have been excellent, it meant nothing in the end.
Translations can often be very helpful. But in this case I agree with the earlier comment – it couldn’t be better said and doesn’t need any explanation.
the translation is just saying the same thing in different words.its giving you the answer to what it means and not letting you think for yourself. the poem states what it is trying to tell you vary clearly, but for some who don’t understand it as well as others, it provides a good insight on what the poem is about.
The vulgarity of the translation provides only the “insight” of vomit. Anyone who doesn’t understand the beauty and power of the original didn’t pay attention in English class and doesn’t need “insight” provided–he needs instruction in basic English comprehension.
I completely disagree with your comment just because people dont necessarily understand parts of this speech doesnt mean that they should of paid more attention in English! I am taking my English GCSE at the moment at these sort of sites help me understand the text more clearly as I make up my own verdict on this wonderful play. Maybe you should be less narrow minded about the kind of people who may actually find this site even the slightest bit helpful.
Shannon should be paying more attention in her GCSE classes. It would prevent her from writing ‘should of’ instead of ‘should have’ and either: this sort of site, or these sorts of sites. She sounds pretty young, and I know I sound pretty old, and am. I’ll be 84 years old in November.
“Should of” is a pet peeve of mine, Ginny! I thouht I was the only one. “Should of”, and “planning on”. I am constantly telling people, planning to, not on!
Pingback: Intro to Poetry « elisebohan
Why all the nastiness? We are all here because of our admiration for the Bard. If this translation brings his writings to another generation, level of literacy or any seeker, let it be, I say.
It is wonderfully spoken as written. Whatever interpretation comes through, is personal to the reader and valid. There is much,e.g., the overwhelming feeling of despair, that is universally felt.
As an engineering major, and weak in English, I find it demeaning when some of you imply readers of this site are somehow stupid and/or lazy. The “didn’t pay attention in English class” argument is inarticulate and quite egotistical. I’ve been on this site for years and love the translations. They’ve helped alleviate stressful nights in high school and college numerous times. Considering that Macbeth was written over 400 years ago should be enough for you English majors to recognize that people unlike yourself aren’t necessarily stupid, but rather need extra help translating middle English to modern English.
To address the “dumbing down of America” comment; You DO realize that it now takes someone with higher education to understand middle English, right? I hope most of you realized that languages change quite fast, often only needing 200-300 years for it to sound completely different. Try reading Old English! That definitely needs a translation for the language evolved so much that it’s a completely new one! When I read middle English, I feel as of I’m reading French. And I say that because I’m familiar with some words, some I’ve never seen and others are spelled exactly like English but have completely different meanings.
You know, when you translate a language, you’re saying the same thing with different words, right Maddie?
Come now, all of you – your comments are more foul than fair! While I agree that the ‘translation’ is weak, the thing with this passage (for me at least) is it’s range of meaning. Shakespeare, I think, was a man who enjoyed tantalising his audiences with the wonder and mystery of life. He was simply ahead of his time. Many modern writers know the power of the reader’s/audience’s humanity – that is, their hope, faith, anger, vulnerability, ambition etc – and use it to connect them to character. In short, Shakespeare was a Modernist, four hundred years before Modernism.
This passage is clear and heartbreakingly beautifully despite being uttered by a human monster. Still, no reason to despise those who want to see it broken down if it helps them understand it better. The key thing is getting people to read the original work and honestly, it’s worth doing. There’s a great Signet edition of the works that I recommend. You can order it cheap from Amazon. It comes with fine annotations and essays on each play.