The term, Shakespeare’s ‘Roman Plays’ is simply a convenient description that critics have given to the three plays that Shakespeare set in ancient Rome.
Another feature of the Roman plays is that it was customary in Shakespeare’s time to use Roman costume on the stage to re-enforce the impression that we are in Rome. Usually, costume wasn’t an important issue: the characters came on dressed in contemporary clothes, for the most part, although social class was depicted by purple and gold for kings, the right kind of material for the nobility, and merchant and peasant dress accordingly. It’s an interesting fact that when actors wore the clothing of a nobleman or a king they were technically breaking the law, as there were strict laws forbidding the use of such clothing if you weren’t a member of that class.
The three plays are always referred to as the Roman Plays, which conceals a number of issues: for example, what kind of plays were they? For example, Antony and Cleopatra is often regarded as a tragedy, or because, like Romeo and Juliet, the tragedy concerns two lovers who suffer equally, a ‘double tragedy’. But even here, the term ‘tragedy’ refers to a form of Greek tragedy which some of Shakespeare’s plays, like Macbeth, strongly resemble, but none of them fits neatly into any category. Antony and Cleopatra, for example, produces strong tragic feelings in the audience but it’s actually written with a comic structure. It’s one of Shakespeare’s most ‘postmodern’ plays. Julius Caesar has a central character, Brutus, who looks very much like a tragic figure but there are too many issues explored in the play for it to be termed a tragedy. It’s therefore convenient to take hold of the ancient Roman setting and call these plays ‘Roman Plays.’
The plays all explore power. They also examine things like loyalty, war, love, friendship and honour.
Although Shakespeare experts don’t always agree, the plays generally called Roman Plays are: